❗️Mind-blowing… cars coming to a halt… 🚗 Despite the Middle Eastern crisis, the European Commission is still unwilling to purchase cheap Russian crude oil (in fact, they’re applauding Zelensky for shutting down the Druzhba pipeline…). Instead, yesterday the Brussels elites suggested that European citizens should SAVE on fuel!
❗️Let’s look at their “advice”:
more working from home, less commuting,
everyone should drive slower on highways,
use public transport instead of cars,
restrict car traffic in major cities,
carpooling,
fuel-efficient driving;
☝️Great! This is the Brussels/TISZA-style “crisis management,” along with abolishing utility price caps and introducing €2.5 (≈1000 HUF) fuel prices.
On April 12, we will send a message to Brussels and their domestic puppets: the fools are on the other side 👍
This is the margin by which the National Election Commission rejected the TISZA submission in which they tried to hold me responsible for posters appearing on the streets of North Pest featuring President Zelensky and the local TISZA candidate.
❗️According to the complainant, either I or my team put up the posters — which is, of course, complete nonsense!
They also object to the fact that I noticed the new Zelensky–Müller Anna posters 😂😂
Dear TISZA supporters!
If someone is actually out on the streets, walking around the district, talking to residents — not hiding, avoiding, or running away from voters like the “silent” TISZA candidates — then yes, they will see, hear, and experience things!
In any case, the National Election Commission’s decision, adopted by a 1️⃣3️⃣–0️⃣ vote, settles the matter.
❗️The real issue, from the perspective of the election and Hungary, is not who put up the posters, but whether a pro-Ukrainian TISZA government comes to power with the help of pro-Ukrainian TISZA candidates, or whether a strong national government remains.
We are all better off with a strong national government 🇭🇺✌️
P.S.: According to eyewitnesses, there are still “honest” TISZA posters out in the constituency — meaning ones that show Zelensky and their candidate, Müller Anna, together in a single image (several reports came in yesterday from Káposztásmegyer).
🧠 Quick overview
👉 Main narrative:
“I am being attacked without basis”
“TISZA = pro-Ukrainian”
“Election = national vs. Ukrainian interests”
👉 Hidden formula:
victimhood + discrediting + enemy framing + geopolitical fear → “the issue doesn’t matter → what matters is which side you’re on”
👉 🔥 Core point:
➡️ concrete issue (posters) → pushed into the background ➡️ focus shifted to: “pro-Ukrainian vs national” ➡️ classic end-of-campaign polarization
🔍 Manipulation techniques
1️⃣ Victim framing
👉 Example: “I was being held responsible… complete nonsense”
Technique:
self-positioning → as the attacked party
criticism = “nonsense”
Goal: ➡️ trigger empathy ➡️ shut down debate (“nothing to discuss”)
Effect: ➡️ followers switch into defensive mode automatically
2️⃣ Authority framing (institutional legitimacy)
👉 Example: “13–0 decision…”
Technique:
numbers + unanimity = illusion of absolute truth
decision → pulled into political narrative
Goal: ➡️ create a sense of “this is fact, not opinion” ➡️ fully delegitimize the opponent
Effect: ➡️ debate closed with numbers (not arguments)
3️⃣ Deflection (whataboutism + reframing)
👉 Example: “that’s not even the real issue…”
Technique:
concrete issue → declared irrelevant
new frame: geopolitics
Goal: ➡️ remove uncomfortable question ➡️ insert own narrative
Effect: ➡️ the actual issue disappears
4️⃣ Enemy framing
👉 Example: “pro-Ukrainian Tisza government”
Technique:
political opponent = tied to external power
implicit accusation: ضد national interest
Goal: ➡️ create distrust ➡️ reinforce “they are not one of us”
Effect: ➡️ strengthens identity-based voting
5️⃣ False dilemma
👉 Example: “pro-Ukrainian government vs strong national government”
Technique:
only two options exist
excludes any middle ground
Goal: ➡️ simplify the choice ➡️ force a decision
Effect: ➡️ rational thinking → replaced by emotion
6️⃣ Ridicule framing
👉 Example: “silent Tisza candidates”, “😂😂”
Technique:
mocking the opponent
doesn’t refute → degrades
Goal: ➡️ undermine credibility ➡️ entertain own base
Effect: ➡️ “we are smart, they are ridiculous”
7️⃣ Authenticity framing (“I’m on the street”)
👉 Example: “walking the district, talking to residents”
Technique:
“I’m among the people” image
implicit: opponent = detached elite
Goal: ➡️ create sense of closeness ➡️ build credibility
Effect: ➡️ illusion of personal connection
8️⃣ Hearsay legitimization
👉 Example: “according to eyewitnesses…”
Technique:
unverifiable information
presented as fact
Goal: ➡️ keep narrative alive ➡️ reinforce without evidence
Effect: ➡️ “there must be something behind it” feeling
🧩 Overall picture
This is a textbook campaign post:
👉 scandal → quickly closed 👉 self-exoneration → via institutional reference 👉 focus shift → to geopolitical fear 👉 ending → mobilization (“national government”)
🔥 Short, raw conclusion
➡️ It’s not about truth ➡️ It’s not about the posters
👉 It’s about this: “deflect + reframe + inject fear + force a side”
Sometimes I leave too early, and sometimes I get home too late. I won’t say it’s easy—in fact, there are moments when it’s especially hard to cope with having less time for what matters most. Many of us live like this; for some, it’s every single day.
Still, I believe that what I do is not just the daily grind—it has weight and meaning. On April 12, we choose our future. We can say yes to a sovereign Hungary where national interest has unquestionable priority. Rejecting war, pursuing a sovereign foreign policy, a patriotic economic policy, and protecting families and pensioners—these are values that many today question, and some even outright reject. It is them we must now overcome.
This balance is not perfect. Sometimes I miss a hug, a longer conversation, a quiet evening. But I know why I do this—and who I do it for.
🧠 Quick snapshot (from a propaganda perspective)
👉 Main narrative:
“I = a hardworking, self-sacrificing ordinary person”
👉 Underlying formula: personal sacrifice + identification + national mission + enemy image → “if you’re not with us → you’re on the wrong side”
👉 🔥 Core point: ➡️ strong emotional identification ➡️ political message wrapped in a personal story ➡️ ends with mobilization (“we must overcome them”)
🔍 Manipulation techniques (in detail)
1️⃣ Personal story = credibility building (ethos framing)
👉 Excerpt: “I leave too early… I get home too late… it’s not easy…”
Technique:
presenting an everyday life situation
“I live the same life as you”
Goal: ➡️ build trust ➡️ position the political actor as “one of us”
Effect: ✔️ lowers critical thinking ✔️ makes later political claims easier to accept
2️⃣ Collective identification (bandwagon + social mirroring)
A new study has come out, and we’re already closer to reality! Yesterday, Endre Hann’s fake research surpassed every previous joke, but today we can finally see the truth as well.
The latest survey from the Nézőpont Institute has been released, showing that 17 days before the election, the national side is leading 46–40.
Although we are ahead, we must not stop here! We still have reserves, and now we must give everything we have to achieve success. In April, everyone is needed—go Fidesz, onward to victory!
Another poll from Nézőpont has also come out. Which one is more credible? Definitely not the one that “Uncle Hann Banni” is allegedly rigging and manipulating in favor of Tisza. So I think Nézőpont is closer to reality, but I also believe that even this still leaves a few percentage points of untapped support for Fidesz.
That’s what we’ll be working on over the next two weeks: making sure every voter who wants to continue living in a safe country turns out to vote.
🧠 Quick Situation Overview
👉 Main narrative:
“We (Fidesz) = reality, strength, victory” “They = lie and manipulate” “Polls = political weapon” “Election = a question of mobilization”
👉 Hidden formula:
delegitimization + own “truth” + numbers as proof + mobilization → “we are leading, but we still need your vote”
🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)
1️⃣ Source delegitimization
👉 Excerpt: “Hann Endre’s fake poll… a joke”
Technique: ➡️ attacking the person + the institution ➡️ not refuting the data, but the source
Goal: 👉 automatic rejection of opposing information
Effect: 👉 the reader doesn’t evaluate → “it’s fake, period”
➡️ Classic: no debate → discrediting
2️⃣ Presenting own source as “truth”
👉 Excerpt: “now we can finally see the truth” “Nézőpont… 46–40”
Technique: ➡️ own poll = presented as objective reality ➡️ legitimized through numbers
Goal: 👉 authority + illusion of rationality
Effect: 👉 “this is no longer opinion, this is fact”
➡️ even though the poll itself is politically aligned
After the Tisza agent scandal, it has become even more important to create a strong, unprecedented national unity with Viktor Orbán for the next four years.
Let us renew our anti-war alliance on April 12 and send a message to Zelensky, to Brussels, and to Péter Magyar, who has made deals with foreign intelligence services that are blackmailing our country.
Anyone who tries to bite us will break their teeth on us!
The countryside is in good shape; the capital is a tougher nut to crack, but we’ll win here too!
Are you voters? You are, and you know the direction. I come from the countryside, and I’m studying here. The countryside is fine. Here in the capital it’s a tougher nut to crack. But I’m glad that people in the capital haven’t brainwashed you. And where are you from? Mosonmagyaróvár? You’re with István Nagy. And that’s where you’re registered too. That’s where you’ll vote as well.
Go Mosonmagyaróvár! Go Kőbánya! Thank you very much! Thanks for coming!
I call on the city leadership — Gergely Karácsony and the Tisza faction of the Budapest City Council — to immediately remove the Ukrainian flag from City Hall.
How can the Ukrainian flag still be flying on the building of the nation’s capital after Volodymyr Zelensky allegedly issued a deadly threat against Viktor Orbán, after Ukrainians have been blackmailing Hungary for weeks over the Druzhba oil pipeline, and after they also threatened us because we brought home two Hungarian prisoners of war from Russian captivity?
❌ Meanwhile, Gergely Karácsony is begging the Ukrainians for “forgiveness” because the Hungarian government took countermeasures against Zelensky’s blackmail — yet he seems unconcerned about what Budapest residents pay for fuel and how much they have to pay for it.
Karácsony says he is “ashamed” that Hungary uses cheap Russian gas — so he must also be ashamed that Budapest residents pay some of the lowest utility bills in Europe.
🚨 According to Karácsony, Ukraine’s accession to the EU is a “first-rate national interest” — but the fact that this would effectively bring the war into the European Union and drag us into it apparently does not concern him.
Most likely, Gergely Karácsony has lost his sense of reality — or he is simply carrying out orders from Brussels.
🗣 When our fellow Hungarians in Transcarpathia are forcibly conscripted and beaten to death by Ukrainians, he was strangely not this talkative.
The left, together with Péter Magyar, has made a pact with Brussels for the sake of Ukraine.
Péter Magyar is now pretending that he has nothing to do with what is happening, while Volodymyr Zelenskyy is openly pressuring Hungary over the oil pipeline. Their objective is clear: to put pressure on the country so that a pro-Ukrainian government comes to power in Hungary.
❗ But let’s look at the facts.
Which party’s representatives appeared in the European Parliament wearing T-shirts with the Ukrainian flag and repeatedly voted for banning Russian energy, providing financial support to Ukraine, and accelerating Ukraine’s EU accession? Tisza.
Which party campaigned in favor of Ukraine joining the European Union? Tisza.
Which party’s defense minister candidate shouted “Slava Ukraini”?Tisza.
And which party leader paid tribute at Ukrainian military graves while saying nothing about the forcibly conscripted ethnic Hungarians from Transcarpathia? Again, Tisza.
Meanwhile, Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian leadership themselves say that the oil blockade is meant to help “pro-Ukrainian” forces come to power in Hungary.
👉 The difference is simple:
They would phase out cheap energy.
We will protect it.
They answer to Brussels and Kyiv.
We answer to Hungary.
The stakes are Hungary’s energy security and the livelihood of Hungarian families.
🟠 Fidesz is the safe choice.
Péter Magyar is pretending that he has nothing to do with the Ukrainian pressure we have seen in recent days, while it is clear that they are cooperating with the Ukrainians in order to bring a pro-Ukrainian government to power in Hungary. That is exactly what the Tisza party represents.
So let’s look at the facts about what Péter Magyar and his allies have done so far.
Who was it whose party members sat in the European Parliament wearing Ukrainian-flag T-shirts and openly supported Ukraine? Whose party voted for abandoning Russian oil and other Russian energy sources in the European Parliament? Whose party campaigned for Ukraine’s accession to the European Union? Whose ally repeatedly shouted “Slava Ukraini”?
And who was the party leader who paid tribute at the graves of Ukrainian soldiers while remaining silent when ethnic Hungarians were forcibly conscripted in Transcarpathia?
We know exactly that Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian leadership themselves are interested in seeing the next Hungarian prime minister called Péter Magyar.
Why? Because they want Péter Magyar and his allies to lobby for Ukraine’s EU accession by 2027, and they also want Hungary to abandon cheap Russian energy.
We all know what that would mean: the end of utility price reductions.
We continue to stand with Hungarian families, while Péter Magyar and his allies stand with Ukraine.
That is what will be at stake in April.
And that is why Fidesz is the safe choice.
The following text is a classic campaign-style political propaganda message that combines several well-known communication and manipulation techniques. The goal is not primarily factual information, but rather to trigger emotional reactions, strengthen a political camp, and mobilize voters.
🎭 Propaganda and manipulation techniques in the text
1️⃣ Construction of an enemy image (demonization)
Excerpt
“Zelensky is openly blackmailing Hungary.” “They want to bring a pro-Ukrainian government to power.”
Technique
👉 constructing an external enemy (Ukraine) 👉 assigning an internal enemy (Péter Magyar / Tisza)
Goal
To create the impression that Hungary is under external pressure or attack, and that the opposition is an instrument of that pressure.
Effect
strong emotional reaction
defensive political reflex
2️⃣ Guilt by association
Excerpt
“wearing Ukrainian-flag T-shirts in the European Parliament” “Slava Ukraini”
Technique
👉 linking a political actor to another country through symbolic gestures
Goal
To portray the opponent as serving foreign interests.
Effect
Readers may develop the perception that:
➡️ “they do not represent Hungarian interests.”
3️⃣ Selective examples (cherry-picking)
Excerpt
references to specific European Parliament votes and symbolic gestures
Technique
👉 presenting only examples that support the desired narrative 👉 omitting context and other decisions or votes
Goal
To construct a simple and one-sided political storyline.
Effect
Complex political decisions appear simplified and one-dimensional.
4️⃣ Dramatization of threat
Excerpt
“the country’s energy security and the livelihood of Hungarian families are at stake”
Technique
👉 emphasizing existential danger
Goal
To create the feeling that:
➡️ “if the opposition wins, serious consequences will follow.”
Effect
fear
political mobilization
5️⃣ False dilemma (binary framing)
Excerpt
“They would eliminate cheap energy, we will protect it.” “They answer to Brussels and Kyiv, we answer to Hungary.”
Technique
👉 reducing a complex political choice to two simple options.
Goal
To simplify the decision for voters:
either the government
or forces acting against national interests
Effect
Political nuance and complexity disappear.
6️⃣ Repetition (classic propaganda technique)
The second half of the text almost completely repeats the same claims.
Technique
👉 continuous repetition of key messages
Goal
To embed the narrative in the audience’s mind.
Effect
Repeated claims may appear more credible, even without proof.
📊 The simplified narrative behind the propaganda
The communication builds a very simple political framework:
Narrative
➡️ Ukraine = blackmail and threat ➡️ Péter Magyar / Tisza = representatives of Ukrainian interests ➡️ Fidesz = defender of Hungarian families and cheap energy
⚖️ Summary
The text is a typical election campaign message that combines several techniques:
construction of an external enemy
linking the political opponent to foreign interests
dramatization of threat
simplified binary political choice
repetition and emotional mobilization
The aim is not to present the complex political situation, but to create an emotionally powerful and easily understandable political narrative.
The Ukrainians have blocked the Druzhba oil pipeline for more than a month, yet he kept his head down until now. Throughout February he did not say a single word about Zelensky’s oil blockade. He did not lift a finger when hearing the constant Ukrainian threats, and he did not even welcome the Hungarian prisoners of war who were freed and able to return home thanks to the national government’s anti-war policy.
Then, when he could no longer stay silent, he finally spoke up. This man is hypocritical and two-faced — everyone knows that behind the scenes he already struck a deal with Zelensky long ago. Who still believes anything he says?
In times of danger, only an experienced and responsible leader can guarantee Hungary’s peace and security. That is why only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.
Péter Magyar stayed quietly in the background until now. What do you think about his current reaction? I consider it a hypocritical and two-faced performance. Where was Péter Magyar in the past weeks when the Ukrainians shut down the Druzhba oil pipeline? Where was he? Where is Péter Magyar today? Where was Péter Magyar yesterday when, thanks to a fantastic diplomatic achievement, we brought home two Hungarian prisoners of war from captivity?
We were able to do this, by the way, because we consistently pursued a peace policy and did not send weapons into this war — otherwise we would have had no chance that these two men could now breathe Hungarian air again. And in response, the Ukrainians started threatening us, trying to blackmail us, and pressuring us to hand over various kinds of information.
Where was Péter Magyar then to stand up against this?
So I consider this a very cheap, petty, and dishonest performance — like when two people who are actually winking at each other behind the scenes agree that on stage one will play the good cop and the other the bad cop.
Who actually buys this?
🎭 Propaganda and Influence Techniques in Alexandra’s Message
The text is a classic political campaign message that combines several rhetorical and propaganda techniques. Its goal is to trigger an emotional reaction in the reader while constructing a simple black-and-white political narrative:
➡️ Orbán = security and peace ➡️ Péter Magyar = betrayal and hypocrisy
Below are the most important techniques used in the message.
1️⃣ Building an Enemy Image (Political Demonization)
Excerpt
“This man is hypocritical and two-faced.” “A very cheap, petty, dishonest performance.”
Technique 👉 character assassination / demonization
Goal To completely undermine the credibility of the political opponent.
Effect
The reader stops evaluating the political claim and instead forms an emotional judgment:
➡️ “Péter Magyar is a liar.”
This reduces rational evaluation.
2️⃣ “Where Was He?” – Repetitive Attack
Excerpt
“Where was Péter Magyar?” “Where was Péter Magyar yesterday?” “Where was Péter Magyar in recent weeks?”
Technique 👉 rhetorical repetition
Goal
To implant a simple message in the voter’s mind:
➡️ “Péter Magyar does nothing.”
Effect
Because of repetition, the claim can appear more credible even without evidence.
This is a well-known propaganda method.
3️⃣ Guilt by Association
Excerpt
“He already made a deal with Zelensky long ago.”
Technique 👉 associating the opponent with an external enemy
Goal
To frame Péter Magyar as someone serving foreign interests.
Effect
The reader may conclude:
➡️ “He does not represent Hungarian interests.”
This technique is particularly powerful in national political communication.
4️⃣ “Us vs. Them” Narrative (Tribal Framing)
Excerpt
“We brought the prisoners of war home.” “We pursue a peace policy.”
Technique 👉 group identity framing
Goal
To divide the political space into two camps.
Us
pro-peace
bringing Hungarians home
defending the country
Them
cooperating with foreign powers
silent
harming the country
Effect
The voter chooses sides emotionally rather than analytically.
5️⃣ Hero-Leader Narrative
Excerpt
“Only an experienced and responsible leader can guarantee Hungary’s peace and security.”
Technique 👉 strong-leader framing
Goal
To portray Viktor Orbán as:
stable
experienced
the protector of the country
Effect
The reader may internalize the message:
➡️ “In times of crisis, a strong leader is needed.”
6️⃣ Oversimplified Cause-and-Effect
Excerpt
“The return of the prisoners of war is thanks to the government’s peace policy.”
Technique 👉 oversimplification
Goal
To present a complex diplomatic process as the result of a single political decision.
Effect
The event becomes framed as a political achievement.
7️⃣ Emotionally Charged Language
The text contains several strong emotional expressions:
“kept quiet”
“cheap”
“petty”
“liar”
“winking behind the scenes”
Technique 👉 emotional language
Goal
To provoke anger and outrage.
Effect
Readers respond emotionally rather than rationally.
8️⃣ Political Theatre Narrative
Excerpt
“Like when two people wink at each other behind the scenes.”
Technique 👉 conspiracy framing
Goal
To pre-emptively discredit the opponent’s criticism.
Effect
The reader may feel:
➡️ “Everything is just a staged performance.”
Summary
The message is a typical piece of campaign rhetoric combining the following elements:
building an enemy image
repetitive attacks
linking the opponent to foreign actors
“us vs. them” narrative
strong-leader framing
oversimplified causality
emotionally charged language
conspiracy framing
Ultimately, the communication reduces politics to a very simple formula:
➡️ Orbán = peace and security ➡️ Péter Magyar = foreign-aligned and untrustworthy
This type of rhetoric is a classic feature of electoral campaign communication.
